Yeah, sometimes I'm sad that I can't send an ultimate reply, then block, except for them being able to read just that reply.
Lately I have been trying to tell manplainers and sea lions what they're doing before blocking them, to give them a shot at apologizing. But it almost always results in angry dudes saying obnoxious things, not apologizing, and that doesn't make anyone feel better.
This is just a reminder to myself to block more people.
What’s the point with the bots on the tags.pub instance? There apparently is one for each hashtag in the Fediverse that has had even some low degree of use? In what way does it work better to follow some foobar@tags.pub account instead of just following the #foobar tag directly? Is there even some malicious intent?
The bots all have the same boilerplate profile: ”Follow me if you're interested in the #foobar hashtag. I'm a global hashtag sharing bot from tags.pub. When content with the #foobar hashtag appears on the Social Web, this account will re-share the content to its followers.”
@mweagle pity it's on Substack. I'll never read it. They platform people who want to kill me
@f_beaudet ah gotcha. Statamic won’t work for you then, sorry.
@emd Yes, I guess my request was unclear. The site generated is static but, as far as I understand, the CMS itself requires to be hosted somewhere.
I am investigating a CMS that can be run locally without having to install a dev environment.
That CMS can then publish a static web site.
@MeierSchulze @dentaku uff, das ist ein server der die hashtags so verbreitet, dass noch mehr menschen (auch Deinen) posts über hashtags folgen können. ich fürchte da ist noch einiges an aufklärungsarbeit zu leisten 👁️ @evan #TagsPub
@MeierSchulze was @dentaku sagt; bitte auch die anderen „blocken”-drunterkommentierenden informieren
@Kuestentroete @necrosis Widerlich. Und unnütz,denn man könnte den Hashtags ganz einfach folgen.