Thank you everyone.
I came up with two reasons that this question could be misleading.
First, because I'm not sure it's fair to say that an LLM-generated image is a "photograph" in any meaningful way. So, maybe no photos are LLM-generated.
Thank you everyone.
I came up with two reasons that this question could be misleading.
First, because I'm not sure it's fair to say that an LLM-generated image is a "photograph" in any meaningful way. So, maybe no photos are LLM-generated.
@lakelady I agree. The problem comes when he runs anyway, and no one can agree whose job it is to stop him.
@lakelady if there was even some chop-logic justification, that would give Republican lawmakers and the conservative press all the cover they would need to obstruct the enforcement of term limits.
If I had to guess, I think they'll try to link it with the 2020 presidential election. Because his term was "stolen", he should get to run for another "make-up" term. It doesn't make sense; it doesn't have to make sense.
@evan it's pretty clear in the 22nd amendment
"Twenty-Second Amendment
Section 1
No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice,"
@evan Remember Bayes
@lakelady we've never had to tell someone not to run for a third term. And it's not clear who would get to say no.
@lakelady I'm not so sure. We could also have a situation like Trump vs. Anderson, where the Supreme Court said that only Congress could decide who was disqualified to serve under section 3 of the 14th Amendment, and Congress never even considered it.
@reiver yes!